[dhcwg] Clarification in RFC 3633

To: dhcwg at ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] Clarification in RFC 3633
From: "ravi kumar" <ravikumar.lrk at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 18:24:17 +0530
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=9Z7EypIgzl0Gp8lIBCE05CZXfYrBdgcif9RzUhUe4Ao=; b=KzQnowv9E6sYUVZ2vMxPMriMeOJ98rqfYWfoqtFpmmFqqmw/zaYg4Ns5j9uI23H+hwNhnPSuDxmW++QitZ1RRTNasRjI6K1cEq/F3Q9NmHAZ290xenjV1wQ7+zH19/HlXmyFm4MuU7sGFkXfUkOmVuKBDN9+bv6AsNE6CMQ2og4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=k7wId8K/FjZjc7NE9Nmyf+KTlIwW92PYfOY4PbxYM4D7FtMiM1y4WtIAKXD+Wgm56VEAPb4fePBRmkgiZ6nS5Hypc7LaJNA7wyohVwa2NuWuHn3zovNZPA2UJ0jmsu0z+7pVvNcuh1YSvRDp6lWIdU2TBCA5kLS/r8+YciAoneY=
List-help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I would like to clarify, if the following scenario is valid, as per RFC 3633:

1) DHCP Server responds with "x" prefixes, in reponse to Client REQUEST message.

2) The client sends RENEW message, with "x" prefixes in IAPD option.

3) Then Server responds with "y" prefixes( where "y" > "x"), in the REPLY message.

Should client accept the REPLY message from Server, as valid REPLY message or Not?

regards

Rav i

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [dhcwg] Clarification in RFC 3633
  - From: Ole Troan