[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dhcwg] Clarification in RFC 3633



> I would like to clarify, if the following scenario is valid, as per RFC
> 3633:
>
> 1) DHCP Server responds with "x" prefixes, in reponse to Client REQUEST
> message.
> 2) The client sends RENEW message, with "x" prefixes in IAPD option.
> 3) Then Server responds with "y" prefixes( where "y" > "x"), in the REPLY
> message.
>
> Should client accept the REPLY message from Server, as valid REPLY message
> or Not?

yes. this is how you do renumbering.

/ot

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg