Re: [dhcwg] Clarification in RFC 3633

Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Clarification in RFC 3633

From: "ravi kumar" <ravikumar.lrk at gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 18:57:39 +0530

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=COdWbRoVQlNmx0l+jcPr6HkkLTRJyIZKhvgU+nvjOOg=; b=th3Uh8x0EWCyQmz2bcCtJLE3o3OYFL7vPhwcdxsys/A2M9NS7tR1NqetxzYy0msj0lmxVPJPgPYAK1jIXRbCFU+NnJjj0gNl3xfHo1j6+VlSdcg2BLn8+HFdmaUg8rO9wLdO6Garqc4gwPkYhoQDY4LyvXa4baoVV2H8+8cQ64w=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=r737rrRJbOFM+JeZB97OOntg0MHPWRU/Ebf8Df/c7N5jwZoQuSkIfRIVzPWj7GhX3nZSZ8R8q6HCZehIirMLxZuIqgkInR3SpbUw//1MYQFiIkCcyd9aMKpdM+I4ZRDV5C7sfZrws1Ri0uzJTvlQxHzuSj3ZOirz793sZ39YrIw=

In-reply-to: <7t5hck0onh2.fsf@gpk-xdm-001.cisco.com>

List-help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>

List-id: dhcwg.ietf.org

List-post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>

List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

References: <adf2a3a0711050454n9dc098bs5205da3c05f84374@mail.gmail.com> <7t5hck0onh2.fsf@gpk-xdm-001.cisco.com>

Thanks for the reply.

So in that case, The client should also accept the newly added prefixes in RENEW message. Am I right?

regards

Ravi

On 11/5/07, Ole Troan <ot at cisco.com> wrote:

> I would like to clarify, if the following scenario is valid, as per RFC
> 3633:
>
> 1) DHCP Server responds with "x" prefixes, in reponse to Client REQUEST
> message.
> 2) The client sends RENEW message, with "x" prefixes in IAPD option.
> 3) Then Server responds with "y" prefixes( where "y" > "x"), in the REPLY
> message.
>
> Should client accept the REPLY message from Server, as valid REPLY message
> or Not?

yes. this is how you do renumbering.

/ot

_______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg