Re: [dhcwg] Clarification in RFC 3633

[Ole Troan <ot at cisco.com>]

> So in that case, The client should also accept the newly added
> prefixes in RENEW message. Am I right?

I don't understand what you mean by a client accepting prefixes in a
RENEW message.

if you mean that the client includes the new set of prefixes in a
subsequent RENEW message, then that is correct.

/ot

> On 11/5/07, Ole Troan <ot at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I would like to clarify, if the following scenario is valid, as per RFC
>> > 3633:
>> >
>> > 1) DHCP Server responds with "x" prefixes, in reponse to Client REQUEST
>> > message.
>> > 2) The client sends RENEW message, with "x" prefixes in IAPD option.
>> > 3) Then Server responds with "y" prefixes( where "y" > "x"), in the
>> REPLY
>> > message.
>> >
>> > Should client accept the REPLY message from Server, as valid REPLY
>> message
>> > or Not?
>>
>> yes. this is how you do renumbering.
>>
>> /ot
>>

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg