Yes, I did find (or was providing some information) about these
options:
249 Windows XP clients request option 249.
252 MAC OS X clients request option 252.
But as they are outside the RFC 3942 reclassified range, there was
no point in doing anything about them.
- Bernie
-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph Droms (rdroms)
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:08 AM
To: dhcp-users at isc.org
Cc: Bernie Volz (volz); DHC WG
Subject: Re: Free Options
Ruben - Take a look at RFC 2131, RFC 2132, RFC 3942 and http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters
for details about option codes available for private use.
Executive summary - with some exceptions, option codes 224-254 are
available for private use. I don't recall the details; I think the
two option codes you mentioned are known to be in unofficial use, but
they don't seem to be documented in http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters
. Bernie - did you receive any information about 249 and 252 in your
followup to RFC 3942?
- Ralph Droms
On Jan 10, 2008, at Jan 10, 2008,10:43 AM, Ruben Rios wrote:
Hi there,
I have been searching on DHCP Options because I would like to use
some private ones for my own private use. Can anyone tell me which
of them can I use for that? I thought I could use any, but while
eavesdropping on my network I have realized some of these options
are already in use ( 249: Classless static routes; 252: proxy
autodiscovery). Are there any others I should avoid using?
Thanks a lot!
Rubén Ríos
Web Revelación Yahoo! 2007:
Premio Favorita del Público - ¡Vota tu preferida!