Re: [dhcwg] Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with M&O bits

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>]

On 14 okt 2008, at 18:45, Pekka Savola wrote:

> The reality is that most implementors will just ignore anything the  
> spec says they don't like or consider unnecessary in the scenarios  
> they have in mind.  As long as their code interoperates (in those  
> specific scenarios) with other major implementations, most couldn't  
> care less.

Not sure what the point of this argument is, unless you mean to say  
that we should all find better things to do with our time than  
participating in the IETF.

If writing a spec is presumed useful it has to be a good spec. The  
IETF writes specifications, not laws, for better or worse.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg