[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dhcwg] Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with M&O bits



On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:06:10AM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> Neither is the current solution described by the RFCs: you are
> required to set up both your IPv6 routers and your DHCPv6 server in
> order for the system to work consistently.

James, we're talking about different things.  You're still talking
about "misconfiguration," and to be bluntly honest, I'm bored by it.

I'd be happy to discuss this with you in a higher bandwidth setting,
if one could be scheduled, but I think additional email is not
productive.  It would probably only frustrate both of us.

-- 
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil?	 https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		     you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		-- Jack T. Hankins

Attachment: pgpdjFwKP0S5g.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg