Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-10.txt

["Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz at cisco.com>]

Agree with David and Kim ... These changes are good and inline with what
was discussed on the list.

Please progress to the next step after WG last call.

- Bernie 

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
Of David W. Hankins
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 3:57 PM
To: DHC WG
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-10.txt

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 02:18:26PM -0500, Kim Kinnear wrote:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-10.txt

Section 4, the new paragraph, s/client's/clients/, cosmetic.

I think these changes are in line with what we discussed (I see
the issue of ORO/ERO is clarified, designating this as a "protocol
option", outside of ORO/ERO processing).

> I believe that this draft is ready to progress to the next step
> after last call.

Me too.

-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		     you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		-- Jack T. Hankins