[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dhcwg] Clarification regarding Dhcpv6 Vendor-specificoption (option 17)



On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:58:39PM +0100, Bud Millwood wrote:
> Our VSO ORO processing is generic, but it would be nice to know if we as a 
> group considered a VSO ORO a "last resort".

I wouldn't say so.  Servers that do not implement sub-option-request-
options will simply supply all configured options all the time.  This
is a superset of what clients will expect.

It's a safe optimization.

-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		     you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		-- Jack T. Hankins

Attachment: pgpEH2V7838hU.pgp
Description: PGP signature