Re: [dhcwg] Vendor Message Drafts - Please Review / Start WG Last Call?

[Kim Kinnear <kkinnear at cisco.com>]

I would support moving these two drafts to last call.

Kim


At 03:30 PM 3/5/2009, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
>2nd request to start DHC WG last call.
>
>Or, does anyone have any objections?
>
>- Bernie
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: dhcwg-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
>Of Bernie Volz (volz)
>Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 5:53 PM
>To: dhcwg at ietf.org
>Subject: [dhcwg] Vendor Message Drafts - Please Review / Start WG Last
>Call?
>
>On 1/22, the updated (and now WG work item) DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 vendor
>message drafts were submitted:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-vendor-message
>-00.txt
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-vendor-message
>-00.txt
>
>The major change over the previous (individual submission) versions was
>that the vendor data now has a specific format instead of being up to
>the vendor. That format for the vendor data is now:
>        octet of vendor-msg-type
>        zero or more octets of vendor-specific options data
>
>This does allow for Wireshark and similar tools to provide some basic
>level of decoding - and it is always possible to add vendor-specific
>decoding (via catalog of vendor messages and option definitions).
>
>Please review as I'd like to request that we do a DHC WG Last Call on
>these documents unless there are issues?
>
>- Bernie
>_______________________________________________
>dhcwg mailing list
>dhcwg at ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>_______________________________________________
>dhcwg mailing list
>dhcwg at ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg