[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dhcwg] way forward for the mipshop-mos-dhcp document



Authors, Bernie,

I looked at the -12 version, and it seemed that there were a few remaining issues:

*Note: The values `0` '4' to '255' are reserved and MUST NOT be used.

... values '0' and '4' to '255' are reserved ...

(2 instances in the document)

Also, in Section 5:

  The sub-option Codes are summarized below.

This text appears to have moved to an incorrect place, it should preceding the table of sub-option codes...

   In case that the server cannot find any Mobility Server satisfying
   the requested Sub-opt Code, the server MUST return the MoS Option
   with a sub-option by setting the Sub-opt Code to the requested
   Sub-opt Code.

This was changed from previous version by deleting text that said something about the length of the option. Bernie's comment was that the indicated length 1 seemed incorrect. But the above text is also incorrect, now you say nothing and we can't distinguish an error from a correctly returned server address. I would suggest keeping the old text but using length 0.

Two instances of this in the document.

Please update the document with a -13 and have Bernie OK your changes. Once that is done, we are moving forward.

Jari