[dhcwg] review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 03 October 2011 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F85C21F8DCB for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.366
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.366 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QfKS+NPrfLi7 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D977121F8DCD for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 13:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so2215199qyk.10 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=iKVU40HJPlhy3LlgVIHvX7s+ebqWAyQUxNd2equuOdc=; b=LBryEBgZeFj5JCTozvF8ym36xrKImrJFwLTPsO/4VaHAWGphsNloF1QQfSbfwBnH2y 584nr3+JdCVqy9QpdRG+C3JLFwoWRCcS7+8pZBDQ5kir5rO7O7kU9PhEbgegQmpWsoGx QMLaNMM0BOQoNF5FeH2Bm42SVNbETzCW5+meU=
Received: by 10.229.66.8 with SMTP id l8mr301046qci.168.1317672347677; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che-vpn-cluster-2-139.cisco.com (198-135-0-233.cisco.com. [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hn10sm17082441qab.20.2011.10.03.13.05.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:05:44 -0400
Message-Id: <6B961032-728D-43D6-81E3-9862EF9ADA09@gmail.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: [dhcwg] review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:02:45 -0000

I'd appreciate a review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option.  Are there any issues, especially with the option format, the suggestions about dealing with large URIs or the inclusion of a separate lifetime in the Location URI?

- Ralph