RE: [Diffserv] Dscp and DscpOrAny TCs

["Jean-Francois Mule" <jf.mule@cablelabs.com>]

> The IPCDN WG as a whole, and this chair in particular, 
> understands that the IETF owns change control for its drafts 
> and RFCs. That doesn't mean that folks in IPCDN will never 
> object to changes -- but is that really unique to this WG?
> 
> What Bert says below is all we can ask for from the IETF:
> 
> >From my point of view, we will not just accept everything and rubber 
> >stamp. But I also understand that we have to be practical 
> and that we 
> >do not just want to make them start from scratch just for the fun of 
> >it.
> 
> -- Richard Woundy, IPCDN Co-Chair
I second Rich's point above.
The cable industry and CableLabs have made tremendous efforts to adopt a
higher net citizen profile in working *with* IETF (of which some of us
"cable" engineers feel a part of and have been a part of in previous
lifes).
 
Jean-Francois Mule, the other IPCDN Co-Chair
_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
diffserv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html