Re: [Dime] Application-id reuse

["Sarkar, Biplab" <bsarkar at starentnetworks.com>]

Hi all,

I was thinking of the consequences of allowing AVP's to have the liberty to either set or un-set the M-bit.
The sender may decide to set it depending upon its judgement about From dime-bounces at ietf.org  Sun Sep 14 21:57:09 2008
Return-Path: <dime-bounces at ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dime-archive at megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dime-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D393A6A22;
	Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dime at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2AD3A6A61
	for <dime at core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.118
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.481, 
	BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id fbXfjA5j8NcC for <dime at core3.amsl.com>;
	Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0.starentnetworks.com (mx0.starentnetworks.com
	[12.38.223.203])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792723A6A06
	for <dime at ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mx0.starentnetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C959003E
	for <dime at ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:57:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mx0.starentnetworks.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mx0.starentnetworks.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 02360-18 for <dime at ietf.org>;
	Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:57:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from exchtewks1.starentnetworks.com (exchtewks1.starentnetworks.com
	[10.2.4.28]) by mx0.starentnetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	for <dime at ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:57:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from exchindia3.starentnetworks.com ([10.6.7.5]) by
	exchtewks1.starentnetworks.com with Microsoft
	SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:57:09 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:27:05 +0530
Message-ID: <69FADB84C90B1248A7DE59422771FA0C146AC3 at exchindia3.starentnetworks.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [Dime] Application-id reuse
Thread-Index: AckW7kIimEr0T+9mS9K0hPjYI7985AAAGc+N
References: <9ad5b0030809090114m53eead10qfcb7b9c9b7fd8936 at mail.gmail.com><C41BFCED3C088E40A8510B57B165C162712B76 at FIESEXC007.nsn-intra.net><9ad5b0030809120239h3f8a45e3jcc9e9ec90269a97e at mail.gmail.com><59D7431DE2527D4CB0F1EFEDA5683ED3031A2270 at SEHAN021MB.tcad.telia.se><9ad5b0030809120329j14337e78ib3bb01b139a9d90c at mail.gmail.com><48CA49E8.1000606 at gmx.net><9ad5b0030809120411pe4f40dfl73f6616ac5c6d7c4 at mail.gmail.com><A48C0AB6-AEF2-4BE2-B8A9-DE4EA8476E27 at iki.fi><9ad5b0030809142109x5c812c03w44d02effe8599d00 at mail.gmail.com><48CDE824.3000506 at kolumbus.fi>
	<9ad5b0030809142147p294d28aar777ccf49be3a3d8f at mail.gmail.com>
From: "Sarkar, Biplab" <bsarkar at starentnetworks.com>
To: "Jacob Martin" <jacobmartin80 at gmail.com>, <jouni.korhonen at iki.fi>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2008 04:57:09.0665 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[82593910:01C916EF]
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.2.1 (20041222) at mx0.starentnetworks.com
Cc: dime at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Application-id reuse
X-BeenThere: dime at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>,
	<mailto:dime-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>,
	<mailto:dime-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dime-bounces at ietf.org
Errors-To: dime-bounces at ietf.org

Hi all,

I was thinking of the consequences of allowing AVP's to have the liberty to either set or un-set the M-bit.
The sender may decide to set it depending upon its judgement about the versthe version of the peer. 
- Will this give added help for extendability? 
- Is it really required to mandate the presence of M-bit for AVPs? Won't it be better to allow the sender to decide?

Some comments on this please.

Thanks & Regards,
Biplab


-----Original Message-----
From: dime-bounces at ietf.org on behalf of Jacob Martin
Sent: Mon 9/15/2008 10:17 AM
To: jouni.korhonen at iki.fi
Cc: dime at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Application-id reuse
 
On 9/15/08, Jouni <ron.kehno at kolumbus.fi> wrote:
> Jacob Martin kirjoitti:
>>
>>> Now that M-bit settings are wrong is just n error in TS29.234
>>>
>> I did not get you on this. could you please explain this again?
> Wm has some new AVPs with M-bit set, as you also pointed out. This goes
> against the rule for "when to create a new application" as no new
> application is
> created. These are just errors in the current TS 29.234.
ok... Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Jouni
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime


ion of the peer. 
- Will this give added help for extendability? 
- Is it really required to mandate the presence of M-bit for AVPs? Won't it be better to allow the sender to decide?

Some comments on this please.

Thanks & Regards,
Biplab


-----Original Message-----
From: dime-bounces at ietf.org on behalf of Jacob Martin
Sent: Mon 9/15/2008 10:17 AM
To: jouni.korhonen at iki.fi
Cc: dime at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Application-id reuse
 
On 9/15/08, Jouni <ron.kehno at kolumbus.fi> wrote:
> Jacob Martin kirjoitti:
>>
>>> Now that M-bit settings are wrong is just n error in TS29.234
>>>
>> I did not get you on this. could you please explain this again?
> Wm has some new AVPs with M-bit set, as you also pointed out. This goes
> against the rule for "when to create a new application" as no new
> application is
> created. These are just errors in the current TS 29.234.
ok... Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Jouni
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime