Re: [Dime] Diameter QoS Parameter -- DECISION TO MAKE
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Dime] Diameter QoS Parameter -- DECISION TO MAKE



Hello,

Are these parameters to be removed (Priority AVP,
> Admission-Priority AVP, and ALRP AVP) related to QoS priority or priority for an government authorized call/session?

Regards,
Viqar
________________________________________
From: dime-bounces at ietf.org [dime-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Elwyn Davies [elwynd at dial.pipex.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:05 PM
To: dime at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Diameter QoS Parameter -- DECISION TO MAKE

Hi.

I support the decision to remove the parameters.

Regards,
Elwyn Davies

> Hi all,
>
> we have a normative reference in the Diameter QoS parameter draft
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-qos-parameters-09.txt
> pointing to http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-11
>
> Yesterday, Magnus posted a mail to the TSVWG list that
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-11.txt is having a lot of problems getting
> through the IESG and the document bounced back to the working group. The
> mail can be found here:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/current/msg09070.html
>
> Now, there is the risk of considerable delay in publication of our Diameter
> QoS parameter document as it will be blocked (for potentially a long time).
> Since the Diameter QoS attribute and the Diameter QoS application document
> normatively depend on the QoS parameter document they will be blocked as
> well.
>
> So, I have been thinking of what we could do to deal with this issue and
> here is a proposal to the group.
>
> ***************
> My proposal is to move the priority parameters (Priority AVP,
> Admission-Priority AVP, and ALRP AVP) into a separate document and to
> progress them independently to get the main part of the Diameter QoS
> parameters document finalized.
> ***************
>
> Please let me know if you find this idea acceptable. Please respond as
> quickly as possible!
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> PS: We would have to find an editor and authors for that the new document
> that contains the priority parameters but we can worry about that part
> larter.
>
>
_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.