Re: [Dime] Diameter QoS Parameter -- DECISION TO MAKE
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Dime] Diameter QoS Parameter -- DECISION TO MAKE



Hi Dan, 
Hi Fortune, 

Normally, I would have said "Please provide text". :-)

But we have tried to provide more specific references with the latest
document update. I hope you both are happy now. 
Here is the updated document: 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-qos-parameters-10.txt

Ciao
Hannes

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca at avaya.com] 
>Sent: 03 March, 2009 16:24
>To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); ext Fortune HUANG; 
>Hannes Tschofenig; dime at ietf.org; magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com
>Subject: RE: [Dime] Diameter QoS Parameter -- DECISION TO MAKE
>
> 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) 
>> [mailto:hannes.tschofenig at nsn.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:29 AM
>> To: ext Fortune HUANG; Hannes Tschofenig; dime at ietf.org; 
>> magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com; Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
>> Subject: RE: [Dime] Diameter QoS Parameter -- DECISION TO MAKE
>> 
>> Hi Fortune,
>> 
>> >Hi Hannes,
>> >
>> >But I still think at least we should provide a brief 
>statement about 
>> >what the AVP indicates.
>> 
>> There is a brief statement about the AVPs in the beginning of the 
>> document.
>> 
>> >And I also would like to have
>> >the detailed location of the relevant reference in this
>> draft because
>> >it would be painful to go over another RFC just for the
>> meaning of one
>> >AVP.
>> 
>> Well. This is somewhat difficult. Think about DiffServ Code Points. 
>> Which part of what document would provide you the information you 
>> would like to know?
>> 
>
>Actually I agree with Fortune on this. If I understand him 
>well he is asking for a more exact pointer to the section in 
>the referred documents (e.g. Section 7.3 in [RFC xxxx] instead 
>of [RFC xxxx]). This is good practice and is possible in the 
>majority of the cases. Even in the case of DSCP we can point 
>to the section where the term is defined of first introduced. 
>
>Dan
>(speaking as a contributor)
>


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.