Re: [Dime] Diameter QoS Parameter -- DECISION TO MAKE
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Dime] Diameter QoS Parameter -- DECISION TO MAKE
Hi Dan,
Hi Fortune,
Normally, I would have said "Please provide text". :-)
But we have tried to provide more specific references with the latest
document update. I hope you both are happy now.
Here is the updated document:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-qos-parameters-10.txt
Ciao
Hannes
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca at avaya.com]
>Sent: 03 March, 2009 16:24
>To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); ext Fortune HUANG;
>Hannes Tschofenig; dime at ietf.org; magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com
>Subject: RE: [Dime] Diameter QoS Parameter -- DECISION TO MAKE
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
>> [mailto:hannes.tschofenig at nsn.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:29 AM
>> To: ext Fortune HUANG; Hannes Tschofenig; dime at ietf.org;
>> magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com; Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
>> Subject: RE: [Dime] Diameter QoS Parameter -- DECISION TO MAKE
>>
>> Hi Fortune,
>>
>> >Hi Hannes,
>> >
>> >But I still think at least we should provide a brief
>statement about
>> >what the AVP indicates.
>>
>> There is a brief statement about the AVPs in the beginning of the
>> document.
>>
>> >And I also would like to have
>> >the detailed location of the relevant reference in this
>> draft because
>> >it would be painful to go over another RFC just for the
>> meaning of one
>> >AVP.
>>
>> Well. This is somewhat difficult. Think about DiffServ Code Points.
>> Which part of what document would provide you the information you
>> would like to know?
>>
>
>Actually I agree with Fortune on this. If I understand him
>well he is asking for a more exact pointer to the section in
>the referred documents (e.g. Section 7.3 in [RFC xxxx] instead
>of [RFC xxxx]). This is good practice and is possible in the
>majority of the cases. Even in the case of DSCP we can point
>to the section where the term is defined of first introduced.
>
>Dan
>(speaking as a contributor)
>
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.