Re: [Dime] Status of Diameter MIB documents?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Dime] Status of Diameter MIB documents?



I have a similar recollection from the discussions in the meeting, with
at least two vendors mentioned as using MIB modules and SNMP for
management, and with the standard RADIUS MIB documents mentioned as the
example of the case where the fact that standard-track RFCs led to the
MIB modules being adopted by vendors. 

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: dime-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Glen Zorn
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 7:42 AM
> To: dime-chairs at ietf.org
> Cc: dime at ietf.org
> Subject: [Dime] Status of Diameter MIB documents?
> 
> I was under the impression after the SF meeting that these 
> drafts would at least considered as WG documents.  What's 
> happening with this?
> 
> ~gwz
> 
> At one time in the US, in the mid-nineteenth century, working 
> for wage labor was considered not very different from chattel 
> slavery...anyone who thinks it's legitimate to be a wage 
> laborer is internalizing oppression in a way which would have 
> seemed intolerable to people in the mills 150 years ago.
>   -- Noam Chomsky, "Propaganda & the Public Mind"
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> 

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.