Re: [Dime] Status of Diameter MIB documents?

["Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net>]

One vendor claiming that they have implemented it (namely Cisco) and one
other vendor (Bridgewater) claiming that they would implement them if they
become RFC. 
 
Not a lot, in my view, but the group was OK with picking them up. 

Ciao
Hannes

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca at avaya.com] 
>Sent: 13 April, 2009 12:59
>To: Glen Zorn; dime-chairs at ietf.org
>Cc: dime at ietf.org
>Subject: RE: [Dime] Status of Diameter MIB documents?
>
>I have a similar recollection from the discussions in the 
>meeting, with at least two vendors mentioned as using MIB 
>modules and SNMP for management, and with the standard RADIUS 
>MIB documents mentioned as the example of the case where the 
>fact that standard-track RFCs led to the MIB modules being 
>adopted by vendors. 
>
>Dan
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dime-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf 
>> Of Glen Zorn
>> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 7:42 AM
>> To: dime-chairs at ietf.org
>> Cc: dime at ietf.org
>> Subject: [Dime] Status of Diameter MIB documents?
>> 
>> I was under the impression after the SF meeting that these drafts 
>> would at least considered as WG documents.  What's happening with 
>> this?
>> 
>> ~gwz
>> 
>> At one time in the US, in the mid-nineteenth century, 
>working for wage 
>> labor was considered not very different from chattel 
>slavery...anyone 
>> who thinks it's legitimate to be a wage laborer is internalizing 
>> oppression in a way which would have seemed intolerable to people in 
>> the mills 150 years ago.
>>   -- Noam Chomsky, "Propaganda & the Public Mind"
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>> 
>