Re: [Dime] rfc3588bis version number

["Glen Zorn" <gwz at net-zen.net>]

Sebastien Decugis [mailto://sdecugis at nict.go.jp] writes

> > I don't mind going with Glen's approach. It would work in our give
> > case. Any other thoughts ?
> Hi,
> 
> In my humble opinion, saying that an implementation MAY do A, but
> SHOULD
> do B, when A and B are contradictory, is equivalent to saying nothing
> at
> all. 

Are you saying that "SHOULD" and "MAY" are equivalent, then?

> So basically you end up not specifying how TLS should be handled,
> which is very not what I would expect from the spec...

I don't understand: in actual point of fact, that is exactly what we are
saying...

...