Re: [Dime] Quick review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana-00.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Dime] Quick review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana-00.txt



Hi:
May I have a quick comment for draft-dime-diameter-cmd-iana.
In the introduction of this draft, it points out a serious design issue that other SDO choose to define new applications on
existing commands rather than asking for assignment of new command codes. I totally agree with it.
 I wonder how this problem is really resolved in this draft?
Does it mean that the other SDO uses vendor specific command code namespace to assign new command codes if they want to
avoid IETF review? Why not strenghen interoperability between different SDO to get around this problem?
Also I wonder whether there is the similar bad design issue in the IETF relevant work?

Regards!
-Qin


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.