Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenance and Extensions(dime)

[Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>]

Glen Zorn wrote:
> I actually don't see any reason to even mention RADIUS or radext in the
> charter...

  If the groups don't need to coordinate, does this mean that the RADEXT
documents can remove all "Diameter considerations" sections?

  If there aren't any RADIUS <-> Diameter gateways in production
environments, this would seem to be a reasonable thing to do.

  Alan DeKok.