Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenance and Extensions(dime)

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn at comcast.net>]

Alan DeKok [mailto:aland at deployingradius.com] writes:

> Glen Zorn wrote:
> > I actually don't see any reason to even mention RADIUS or radext in
> the
> > charter...
> 
>   If the groups don't need to coordinate, does this mean that the
> RADEXT
> documents can remove all "Diameter considerations" sections?

I had thought that that was pretty much the consensus reached during the
radext "virtual interim" (bowing to the radext Chairs, of course).

> 
>   If there aren't any RADIUS <-> Diameter gateways in production
> environments, this would seem to be a reasonable thing to do.
> 
>   Alan DeKok.