Re: [Dime] Comments about Webauth application
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Dime] Comments about Webauth application
Hi Niklas,
See below.
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : dime-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces at ietf.org] De
> la part de Niklas Neumann
> Envoyé : lundi 24 août 2009 14:56
> À : dime at ietf.org
> Objet : [Dime] Comments about Webauth application
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I would like to address the comments we received during the
> last IETF meeting regarding the Diameter Webauth application.
> If you have missed the presentation, the slides are available here:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/75/slides/dime-8.pdf
>
>
> * Diameter SIP application also includes HTTP digest authentication:
> This is true and WebAuth is actually reusing the AVP
> specifications made in RFC 4740. I do not suppose the
> suggestion is that people should just implement 4740 if they
> just want to use HTTP authentication over Diameter so I do
> not see any problems with that.
Maybe the question could be: does the use of the MAR/MAA command pair with the Application-id "Diameter SIP Application (6)" fulfil your requirements?
If the answer is "yes", you don't have to create a new application. You can just specify that in the context of Web authentication, MAR/MAA are used for HTTP Digest authentication. If there is no modification to the command ABNF description nor new mandatory AVP to support for webauth, the application-id can be re-used as such. There is no need to implement the whole RFC 4740 "Diameter SIP application" if you want only to support the authentication part.
Lionel
>
> * Corresponding RADIUS specification (RFC 5090) is not
> adopted due to latency issues:
> I cannot really comment if anybody uses RFC 5090 or not.
> However, RFC 5090 obsoletes RFC 4590 so there must have been
> at least some interest to put work into another revision of
> the original RFC.
> Regarding the latency I see how this might be an issue if you
> do the Diameter authentication for every HTTP request.
> However, I think it is more realistic that HTTP servers will
> cache Diameter responses or even open some sort of session
> context which will only be initially authenticated.
>
>
> I really appreciate any of your comments. I think that web
> environments can benefit from authentication and
> authorization standards to make life easier for site
> administrators and to benefit from existing Diameter
> deployments. If there is anything that would make the draft
> more adoptable please let us know.
>
>
> Best regards
> Niklas
>
> --
> Niklas Neumann - University of Goettingen, Institute of
> Computer Science http://user.informatik.uni-goettingen.de/~nneuman1/
> Tel: +49 551 39-172053
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.