![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Mark Jones wrote:
Hi Tom, I was expecting a stronger statement on advertisement at the application level, e.g. "Because realm-based redirection is not part of base Diameter behaviour, support for realm-based redirection by the peers MUST be advertised at the application level." I don't see how the feature works reliably otherwise and punting the risk evaluation to the service provider seems inappropriate for a feature likely to used on inter-service-provider interfaces. Regards Mark