Re: [Dime] Diameter API draft.

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca at avaya.com>]

What does the WG want to do with the I-D? Declare it 'Dead'? Publish it as Historic RFC with a note reflecting that this was OBE (Overcome By Events)?

 

Dan

 

---

From: dime-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Victor Fajardo
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:29 PM
To: vfajardo at research.telcordia.com; dime at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Diameter API draft.

Hi,

 

It’s been over a month and we have not had any feedback regarding the Diameter API doc. At this point, I think it’s safe to say that no one is interested in continuing this work and so we will effectively remove this doc from the charter.

 

Regards,

Victor

 

 

From: dime-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Victor Fajardo
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:25 AM
To: dime at ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] Diameter API draft.

 

Hi Folks,

 

During the last IETF, we were trying to gauge if there is leftover interest in continuing work with the Diameter AP (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-diameter-api-08)I. This email is a follow up to solicit a final vote/hum for this draft. If you see value in this draft and wish to see the work continue,  make sure you respond to this email as well as address the questions “why and who” would use this API. If you don’t see any value in this work pls state so as well. We’ll give this hum some time to circulate through peoples mailboxes (a month or so) after which we can decide the fate of the draft.

 

Regards,

victor