Re: [Dime] Diameter API draft.

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca at avaya.com>]

Just to clarify - the comment 'Personally, I like the latter idea' in
the thread belongs to Glen. 

I have no preference and will support whatever course the WG reaches
consensus about. 

Dan

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net] 
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 7:41 PM
> To: 'Glen Zorn'; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); 
> vfajardo at research.telcordia.com; dime at ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Dime] Diameter API draft.
> 
> Hmmm. 
>  
> Publishing something as historic is not particularly helpful 
> and only wasting the time of the RFC Editor. 
>  
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 	From: dime-bounces at ietf.org 
> [mailto:dime-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Glen Zorn
> 	Sent: 12 October, 2009 16:37
> 	To: 'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'; 
> vfajardo at research.telcordia.com; dime at ietf.org
> 	Subject: Re: [Dime] Diameter API draft.
> 	
> 	
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	What does the WG want to do with the I-D? Declare it 
> 'Dead'? Publish it as Historic RFC with a note reflecting 
> that this was OBE (Overcome By Events)?
> 
> 	Personally, I like the latter idea.
> 
> 	Dan
> 
> 	 
> 
> 		 
> 
> 		________________________________
> 
> 				From: dime-bounces at ietf.org
> [mailto:dime-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Victor Fajardo
> 		Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:29 PM
> 		To: vfajardo at research.telcordia.com; dime at ietf.org
> 		Subject: Re: [Dime] Diameter API draft.
> 
> 		Hi,
> 
> 		 
> 
> 		It's been over a month and we have not had any 
> feedback regarding the Diameter API doc. At this point, I 
> think it's safe to say that no one is interested in 
> continuing this work and so we will effectively remove this 
> doc from the charter.
> 
> 		 
> 
> 		Regards,
> 
> 		Victor
> 
> 		 
> 
> 		 
> 
> 		From: dime-bounces at ietf.org 
> [mailto:dime-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Victor Fajardo
> 		Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:25 AM
> 		To: dime at ietf.org
> 		Subject: [Dime] Diameter API draft.
> 
> 		 
> 
> 		Hi Folks,
> 
> 		 
> 
> 		During the last IETF, we were trying to gauge 
> if there is leftover interest in continuing work with the 
> Diameter AP 
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-diameter-api-08)I.
>  This email is a follow up to solicit a final vote/hum for 
> this draft. If you see value in this draft and wish to see 
> the work continue,  make sure you respond to this email as 
> well as address the questions "why and who" would use this 
> API. If you don't see any value in this work pls state so as 
> well. We'll give this hum some time to circulate through 
> peoples mailboxes (a month or so) after which we can decide 
> the fate of the draft.
> 
> 		 
> 
> 		Regards,
> 
> 		victor
> 
> 
>