[Dime] Another round of WGLCs and WG status

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Mon, 26 April 2010 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1123A6B83 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.408, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6mVIiTpjCmFD for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639FE3A6B87 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so259578fgb.13 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:cc:to :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=BDw/iRtYstleVubtWyW4W5VkbKLqpohdWromUs1qbD4=; b=eqU+uIzQXmzhQqH5gLI8quMTf0ZinGuG14OMuaxKYUakoXwYt1xB8B68wIp46v4poZ RajMCgrITC2FZ7hvBv7YjeGizbhTP1uDwqJnsY/mj0jkoSkP0q5Ud5B0T0Awfu2g0S9z 3Wg9oL01kJ0fg+bFE6w94++0XDFVilwHJOv3k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=S9qznLbV2FfXw6KGfPCNA6aPCIs72Jlz8WKbwzrm5zKjIoskT+hec9FxsCb7PfRYTv umtzNDGPtviO71ptVo2vL/NicIjVO9E+PElpSr72SU+TexOjD/ZRqzD54rQDFOrKHORQ ZICWXKJgsSKXAZmlM5teBHe5SIyLs8gDgeO5I=
Received: by 10.87.5.30 with SMTP id h30mr1947283fgi.3.1272281371488; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a88-114-71-96.elisa-laajakaista.fi (a88-114-71-96.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.71.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm8208247fks.56.2010.04.26.04.29.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:29:31 +0300
Message-Id: <10A80F70-2ED3-4A02-9711-7A5ED6C702D1@gmail.com>
To: dime@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Subject: [Dime] Another round of WGLCs and WG status
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:29:58 -0000

Hi all,

The following drafts have been in kind of a limbo for quite some time.

1) draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps       WGLC ended 16th Mar
2) draft-ietf-dime-capablities-update  WGLC ended 23rd Jan
3) draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran       WGLC ended 7th Mar
4) draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis          WGLC ended 5th July 
5) draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide

The WGLC for draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-01 ended 7th Match. We received only *one* review and a subsequent draft revision. Although, a WGLC stands for the "last call", we decided to run one quick more due the low number of reviews. Please, review the document and give any indication whether you are fine with it or not. The WGLC#2 ends 10th May.

The WGLC for draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps ended 16th March. We received *one* comment and decided to run one more based on the same reasons as above. Please, review the document and give any indication whether you are fine with it or not. The WGLC#2 ends 10th May.

Although it may not look like it, we definitely intend to move above two documents forward as soon as possible. I encourage respective authors to work offline to get people to review their documents.

Lionel and I will have a look at draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide, and hopefully get the document move forward soon.

Jouni will write a proto write-up and shepherd the rfc3588bis (after I actually have read latest revision).
Lionel will write a proto write-up and shepherd the capablities-update.



Jouni & Lionel