Re: [Dime] Review of draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-03

Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Sun, 09 May 2010 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA1628B56A for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 May 2010 16:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.176, BAYES_50=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5-J3jbUyKwX for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 May 2010 16:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s24.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s24.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.99]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D0B3A66B4 for <dime@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 May 2010 16:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP31 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s24.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 9 May 2010 16:24:57 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [70.26.23.183]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP313609B971C1D8549C1C92D8F80@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.11] ([70.26.23.183]) by BLU0-SMTP31.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 9 May 2010 16:24:57 -0700
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 19:24:54 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
References: <AC1CFD94F59A264488DC2BEC3E890DE50A43AE83@xmb-sjc-225.amer.cisco.com> <00b701caedc5$92e4d150$b8ae73f0$@net>
In-Reply-To: <00b701caedc5$92e4d150$b8ae73f0$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2010 23:24:57.0798 (UTC) FILETIME=[D6B52E60:01CAEFCE]
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Review of draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-03
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 23:25:10 -0000

Below.

Glen Zorn wrote:
> Joseph Salowey  <mailto:[mailto://jsalowey@cisco.com%5d>
> [mailto://jsalowey@cisco.com] writes:
> 
>  
> 
> I think this specification is useful.    Here are some  comments:
> 
>  
> 
> 1.       Key types -  The document lists USRK and DSUSRK as key types.
> These are a class of keys and do not necessarily refer to a specific
> application.  How would one represent different USRKs for different usages?
> Are rMSK and rRK examples of USRKs?  
> 
>[GZ] Any recommendations?

[PTT] Looking at that section it seemed natural to me to specify applicable 
domain and key usage as separate attributes.

...