[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available

From: Victor Pascual Avila <victor.pascual.avila at gmail.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing at cisco.com>
Cc: dispatch at ietf.org
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:08:54 +0100
In-reply-to: <048d01ca67c4$96503410$c2f0200a at cisco.com>
References: <F592E36A5C943E4E91F25880D05AD1140CC8E1F3 at zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <4B01A877.4010306 at iptel.org> <4B01B9E8.7050507 at neustar.biz> <048d01ca67c4$96503410$c2f0200a at cisco.com>

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Dan Wing <dwing at cisco.com> wrote:
>> I do not find the requirement for NAT traversal unacceptable,
>> but I do
>> consider the requirement for media steering highly dubious at best.
>
> "Highly dubious" = nobody really does it?

Network administrators have actually found it easier to rewrite SDPs
than to use other existing mechanisms.

Cheers,
-- 
Victor Pascual Ávila

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available
  - From: Elwell, John

References:
- [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available
  - From: Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available
  - From: Jiri Kuthan
- Re: [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available
  - From: Jon Peterson
- Re: [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available
  - From: Dan Wing

Prev by Date: Re: [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available
Next by Date: Re: [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available
Previous by thread: Re: [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available
Next by thread: Re: [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.