RE: SAML and REST - was Re: [dix] DIX use cases
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: SAML and REST - was Re: [dix] DIX use cases



The point is that this is precisely what the HTTP authorize header was
defined for. Sending the data as payload is the change.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:cabo at tzi.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:36 PM
> To: Digital Identity Exchange
> Subject: Re: SAML and REST - was Re: [dix] DIX use cases
> 
> Do we really need to change HTTP for DIX?
> 
> Gruesse, Carsten
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dix mailing list
> dix at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
dix at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.