RE: SAML and REST - was Re: [dix] DIX use cases

["Suresh Venkatraman" <sureshven at gmail.com>]

Disagree - DIX should work with any HTTP/1.1 UA, not just a browser. Is there a dependency on processing HTML in DIX?

 

---

From: thayes0993 at aol.com [mailto:thayes0993 at aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:50 AM
To: dix at ietf.org
Subject: Re: SAML and REST - was Re: [dix] DIX use cases

 

No!  I think the intended scope of DIX is to work within the existing HTTP capabilities.  In fact, DIX is intended to work in an HTML/browser environment, rather than in non-HTML applications such as WEBDAV or even browser-based AJAX schemes.

 

I'd like to discuss changes to HTTP somewhere, but probably not on the DIX list.

 

Terry

 
-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo at tzi.org>
To: Digital Identity Exchange <dix at ietf.org>
Sent: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:35:39 -0600
Subject: Re: SAML and REST - was Re: [dix] DIX use cases

Do we really need to change HTTP for DIX? 
 
Gruesse, Carsten 
 
_______________________________________________ 
dix mailing list 
dix at ietf.org 
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix 

_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
dix at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix