Re: [dix] Re: [Ietf-http-auth] New draft on anti-phishing requirements
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dix] Re: [Ietf-http-auth] New draft on anti-phishing requirements
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Rescorla <ekr at networkresonance.com> writes:
Eric> Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu> writes:
>>>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Rescorla <ekr at networkresonance.com> writes:
Eric> Right. I indicated in my message, I'm not sure this draft
Eric> dissects the reqts correctly.
>> Understood. However all your criticisms to date have been
>> rather minor.
Eric> Hmm... I didn't mean to give that impression. I certainly
Eric> don't think the "it's all about UI" point is minor.
I am not sure whether it is minor. I think we are in broad agreement
that the interesting work in this space must involve the UI and is not
principally a protocol problem.
--Sam
_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
dix at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.