![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
It is a requirement if you require to support more than authN. Access to a site might require an "I am over 21" token, authZ without direct authN - DIX supports that, and I believe it is important to do so."John" == John Merrells <merrells at sxip.com> writes:
John> I'm not sure if you're saying this but... DIX does not John> impose any specific number of identifiers on a user. They John> can have as many as they choose to have, from 0 to infinity.
No, but dix does support transporting more than one claim and does support claims that are not identifiers.
I don't view doing so as a requirement.
-- Pete
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dix mailing list dix at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix