Re: [dix] Re: [Ietf-http-auth] BOF Request: WARP - Web Authentication Resistant to Phishing
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dix] Re: [Ietf-http-auth] BOF Request: WARP - Web Authentication Resistant to Phishing



Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu> writes:

>>>>>> "Pete" == Pete Rowley <prowley at redhat.com> writes:
>
>     Pete> It is a requirement if you require to support more than
>     Pete> authN.  Access to a site might require an "I am over 21"
>     Pete> token, authZ without direct authN - DIX supports that, and I
>     Pete> believe it is important to do so.
>
> I think the over-21 example is particularly bad because I cannot
> imagine a site (at least in the US) not taking responsibility for that
> check themselves based on demographic data they request.  It seems
> like way too much of a risk to outsource this to an identity provider
> especially if you allow identities from a number of different identity
> providers.

I'm surprised to see you make this claim, since outsourced
adult verification services for porn sites are extremely common.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_Verification_System

-Ekr

_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
dix at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.