RE: [dix] Re: Dix & OpenId?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dix] Re: Dix & OpenId?
Oh... I neglected to mention...
I'm very pleased to hear that Sxip and OpenID folks are talking...
Here's hoping they'll save me the trouble of having to figure
out exactly how the 2 protocols are different ;-)
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dick Hardt [mailto:dick at sxip.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:52 AM
> > To: David Fuelling
> > Cc: 'Digital Identity Exchange'
> > Subject: [dix] Re: Dix & OpenId?
> >
> > On 9-Aug-06, at 7:14 AM, David Fuelling wrote:
> > > The OpenId 2.0 draft spec has many similar components to
> > the DIX draft
> > > 1 (pre-saml) spec. In addition, it looks like Sxip Identity is a
> > > founding sponsor of the OpenId bounty program, which seems a bit
> > > counter-intuitive to me (although I can see the motivation
> > of wanting
> > > to publicize Identity 2.0 in general). Regardless, Sxip
> > Identity has
> > > based Sxip 2.0 on dix, and has been a major backer of dix.
> > Hi David
> >
> > The timing of your question is impeccable!
> >
> > The Sxip people are working with incorporating much of DIX
> > into OpenID 2.0. There have been a number of backroom
> > conversations going on (mostly with the folks at JanRain and
> > David Recordon of VeriSign) and there is a meeting at
> > VeriSign's Mountain View offices tomorrow if anyone on this
> > list is interested in attending.
> >
> > Converging the protocols seems to make the most sense
> > (features from each were being incorporated in the other anyway)
> >
> > -- Dick
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
dix at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.