[dmarc-ietf] interoperability issues around gateway-transformation

John Bucy <jbucy@google.com> Thu, 19 March 2015 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jbucy@google.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3131A9091 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xiMxHBo9HZT1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC2D91A906E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oier21 with SMTP id r21so75490656oie.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kYUhFxN790F+2+m5L8XwcCNig4KEuEtpDRyqgm/6yw8=; b=fceokh8Q1vcmACo6VT7SmhpIsQfVvG2tDGHBe8xyg0b3t6xRaGFFn5shWmxNJZnWhx QsuUK7yrBCM9M4dou4kv9yndwGWtN+scB+K7IC52NA13WIFoXVZ4PC/f+4HYeg/+d6X3 mvkG7oIZ7keWiNhygl+f/xPy2qVIAxkYHk89oRUytj9Z3a/Q7Jus3ZP0aaf8X/4i52bc jpe6BPBSVjJR4H9J5/IXG8hbPsPPk1aYUWqvSDWSs1ZRxfnr/Kiyabq5XUaNQOlCrhBH cuytfD/nnXn8PW8/N3+5Nv5XRidfW7H5PskCjzakNoLoUfAsxdgcjLi3XXf218KsK1fJ U+Rw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kYUhFxN790F+2+m5L8XwcCNig4KEuEtpDRyqgm/6yw8=; b=gBKyhaFeSwNd5l6vYEnFn4V9ih6XIWU2g9ighVjUfguJHuqHeQ+MI7DsN6tvNVnWDX KbdsCvSfmWHt0Ogu7tdnkszOkhKGyCwfVoG8cUU+/m7BmzMzOEMe8wmPgRVp6it9FJep 3J+HVP2SQHqRvEbBNND3f3R0jofBilKHmilcO4WN8sruHOIgO6pagcNtYrCWX0JaC3FD UlU+5u175N0+YZn1D1oSLfU1Q6kM0K7NGZdSLylS1pr+IlxFGmOSotHx/qM4Ce0Svt64 hSBb0Ngw7fhHVm1MqyGOfHDM0wz5wBUD6JqvGP+A1+ycvF81IdJ9+RfbodGbKv6FYos0 TUbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl+3qfAdfHRV8u9SPDKzKgaBcIbWxmXwRE/D0nMSCIKSJNCC6QVNuEpmPyCsC/E7jsX85hD
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.84.144 with SMTP id z16mr43751194oey.32.1426797901208; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.98.85 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:45:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CALui8C1b7=htQvTBwaRG9xgJ+T-sgthMWeWZNb2a8SXm3B8q1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Bucy <jbucy@google.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e011825ec1188530511aa467e"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/BE1xym6fVe20w71gYFZcekcN--k>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] interoperability issues around gateway-transformation
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:45:40 -0000

I was glad to see mention of content-transfer-encoding issues
in draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability since gateway-transformation breaks
dkim signatures. Is there any interest in trying to develop a mime-aware
canonicalization for dkim?



cheers
john