[DMM] issues posted for dmm gap analysis
Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Fri, 28 March 2014 05:44 UTC
Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB231A0455 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PTxpPFN2i2Jq for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95C21A07D7 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e16so3331642lan.2 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=0R5Nz2ti+Dq/lNU90bW1gnvfzhWHN4Z9EPLH3UMwviA=; b=MIrZMyCuG8hHHYUx8pP8OUD0yqFNL8LktRydtucDslhXwsEdwEUQmHWypWsVDCeulM fVHj+LO+dOs34Gwx6R6kVP/MRH8zctOoolmQm2egNtxrNLT49FDz21gUUfdisEPdHJa8 mZM4SftRtcofRKoDQlE/eNNIk+IskF9BXGFU6/FaORjQG+/2d0hk7wCBO3BoKlWUp5Hz kliGJ6OLdPVOENHVTrjCdYGRpGEsk9yWcxfQGJB+PksQ+aag803mE8MGxz9HfmO1CPvY xkh3QfGpyRa01EKBtXd7LIrMhLHJxW/qWY4xWHXL7OAYAWht6ijwTnBaJ5G8DAnNjG4M 7VGQ==
X-Received: by 10.152.1.8 with SMTP id 8mr4097259lai.1.1395985482156; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.117.15.107] ([188.117.15.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q8sm2926182lbr.3.2014.03.27.22.44.40 for <dmm@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8906E196-0079-4A90-8A42-93814FB22439@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:44:39 +0200
To: dmm@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/rTnAyIs0UfXkgeriRS13zDJ3TlY
Subject: [DMM] issues posted for dmm gap analysis
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 05:44:52 -0000
Folks, Charlie made an extensive review of the gap analysis and posted few issues. See then here; http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dmm/trac/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&component=best-practices-gap-analysis - JOuni
- [DMM] issues posted for dmm gap analysis Jouni Korhonen