IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Fri, 25 July 2014 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705251B290F for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 06:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R-adjif56NZp for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 06:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DA7E1B28BA for <dmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 06:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id w61so4344789wes.25 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 06:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2diIiq7tLew31dgkbuGNQTYfghPXW64I29AVzUprQ48=; b=XF8nRt4XLcgcdeog92oXxyVpdoiE9qlr27Q5s5tVf5okeLJbJvOniegPhE76TiN5VH cNLWrNLBa9pB6zPAJ9tU3LCRulTGg/vBuZXwn+NIUDLzSSlVZ9Y2dpjNMQo8OvVxsk4x FAbG6263wTI7BlN+i9BRcodmzcBL1Fa8h07YL6oC9BmvJ0olIX+BRtRMuWVSQmHrFI2W B8uvLccb+ayU/SHokQW2b7RvQAUEgTnxUEHBofLAMDgKBEuFCnASdM8e2hRAcfAWq9Wk kvSjenRdTrmZsS6tSWiO83x6qxx7lCdh/erkbtahJkXFZsQTXs+6Y99gvfVByLosk0JX Bq1Q==
X-Received: by 10.180.102.98 with SMTP id fn2mr5412342wib.39.1406296743201; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 06:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:e422:62d2:84a7:859? ([2001:67c:370:176:e422:62d2:84a7:859]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fs3sm6261196wic.20.2014.07.25.06.59.02 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Jul 2014 06:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53D262A4.6040201@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 16:59:00 +0300
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, dmm@ietf.org
References: <53D17F75.3030207@gmail.com> <CAC8QAceH3aYiV_HB9uok1_OQ5=2bvjHONb=x6Dc28XW-KXOw4g@mail.gmail.com> <53D18608.9090003@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <53D18608.9090003@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/vqSiss5ZCzLyiLKqvVceB07M8PM
Subject: Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:59:09 -0000


7/25/2014 1:17 AM, Brian Haberman kirjoitti:
>
>
> On 7/24/14 6:01 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>> Hi Jouni,
>>
>> Regarding
>>
>> Distributed mobility management deployment models and scenarios:
>>
>> As I said in the session today I am having trouble understanding the
>> deployment models.
>>
>> To me it sounds like doing the last thing first, i.e. after we get the
>> dmm solution we work on how to deploy it (of course if the deployment
>> has not already been considered by the solution).
>
> I may be interpreting the charter incorrectly, but I think there may be
> a disconnect.  I interpreted the the charter text as describing
> deployment models like:
>
> - Wi-Fi-based mobility management
>
> - Cellular (e.g., 3GPP) mobility management
>
> - Mixed technology mobility management
>
> - etc.
>
> If that above interpretation is what was intended, I think it makes
> sense to have that type of description available to guide solution
> development.

The above interpretation is correct.

- Jouni


>
> If the above is not correct, then I suspect the charter needs some
> clarification.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email