Re: L-Root address change [Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs]

Matt Larson <mlarson@verisign.com> Wed, 28 November 2007 15:58 UTC

Return-path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxPIp-0000hR-5g; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:58:19 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxPIo-0000hK-Ma for dnsop@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:58:18 -0500
Received: from cliffie.verisignlabs.com ([65.201.175.9]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxPIo-0007a8-Cr for dnsop@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:58:18 -0500
Received: from monsoon.verisignlabs.com (scooter.bo.verisignlabs.com [172.25.170.10]) by cliffie.verisignlabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FEA1367A1; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:58:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dul1mcmlarson-l1.verisignlabs.com (dul1mcmlarson-l1.verisignlabs.com [10.131.244.205]) by monsoon.verisignlabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF16A242315; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:58:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:58:17 -0500
From: Matt Larson <mlarson@verisign.com>
To: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
Subject: Re: L-Root address change [Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs]
Message-ID: <20071128155817.GE494@dul1mcmlarson-l1.verisignlabs.com>
References: <20071127141848.GA16571@nic.fr> <20071127150813.GD33734@moof.catpipe.net> <474C40DF.8080100@publicroot.org> <9B9F9C57-5000-4A63-99CA-89EEB8014205@icann.org> <474C9497.7020308@publicroot.org> <CDFBEFF8-B4BD-4D2B-8E86-6919B62DBA14@icann.org> <474C9A04.1090405@publicroot.org> <77E55800-E184-4225-91C5-59DA85D3E156@icann.org> <20071128095544.GB19314@unknown.office.denic.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071128095544.GB19314@unknown.office.denic.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Peter Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:35:29PM -0800, John Crain wrote:
> 
> > Currently about 60% New IP to 40% old IP... and rising slowly
> > 
> > So clearly a lot of folks still need to up date their hints files :(
> 
> part of that traffic will be due to old hints files, but priming was
> actually supposed to accelerate the migration.  40% of total L traffic
> seems a bit much for 1/13 of the priming traffic?

Why old root server IP addresses recieve so much traffic is a great
mystery and has been for several years.  We addressed this in 2004 in
the "Life and Times of J-root" presentation for NANOG 32:

  http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0410/pdf/kosters.pdf

Note that at the time, I fingerprinted the responsive queriers and
many were late-model BIND, all of which are known to prime.

As I write this, J root's old IP address is receiving 1000 queries per
second and that's over five years after we changed its address.
Perhaps this is some sort of DNS equivlanet to cosmic background
radiation, dating back the beginning of the Internet?

Matt

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop