Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dns-recursive-discovery-00

[David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org>]

Hi,

On Oct 21, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Indeed LOCAL.ARPA would need to be unsigned.
> Not really.  Why would it need to exist in the public tree at all?
> All we need is agreement from both ICANN and IETF that LOCAL.ARPA is
> reserved and not to be delegated in the official tree.

Entries in the ARPA tree are (now) only created by the IAB or a protocol action. ICANN merely implements what we're told. I'd suggest an IANA considerations section that simply said that "LOCAL.ARPA" is reserved and must not be delegated.

Regards,
-drc