[DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: Kerberos service discovery
Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com> Tue, 31 May 2016 07:08 UTC
Return-Path: <pspacek@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5022912B04F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 00:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.348
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oeb4FiHpJOfp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 00:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E137112B038 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 00:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1F565400 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 07:08:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pspacek.brq.redhat.com (ovpn-204-58.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.58]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4V78ig8018069 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 03:08:46 -0400
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
From: Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
Message-ID: <df9d8d34-6005-6b61-e9d1-397d915aa197@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 09:08:44 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 31 May 2016 07:08:46 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/oi-busyoh30_8m07fgL6aTyMG-o>
Subject: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: Kerberos service discovery
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 07:08:48 -0000
Hello, I would like to draw attention of dnsop WG to discussion about new service discovery method for Kerberos: Please see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/current/msg06044.html and its continuation http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krbdev/2016-May/012588.html Main arguments for using TXT instead of URI RR type are: ... > We had been planning to use the URI record type, but after a recent > round of discussion, we don't think it's likely that popular DNS hosting > providers will allow customers to create URI records (since it seems > like no one else is using them). Some middle-boxes would also block DNS > queries for URI records. That problem would be even worse if we create > a new record type. So, we are planning to use the TXT record type. It > seems unlikely that we can standardize on a TXT record through the IETF > (except perhaps as an informational RFC), but it seems like the only > deployable option for individuals and small organizations ... Could someone validate these assumptions? I do not like TXT but I'm not in position to judge validity of these arguments. Thank you for your time. -- Petr Spacek @ Red Hat
- [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: Kerbe… Petr Spacek
- Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: K… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: K… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: K… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: K… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: K… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: K… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] New usage for TXT RR type on radar: K… Paul Wouters