IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [domainrep] RFC 5782, was I-D.*-reputation-*.01

"John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Thu, 27 October 2011 12:20 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EEB21F89B8 for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.990, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PD7m-jWhRLzS for <domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA11521F858D for <domainrep@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 40175 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2011 12:19:59 -0000
Received: from gal.iecc.com (64.57.183.53) by mail2.iecc.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2011 12:19:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 62267 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2011 12:19:59 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 27 Oct 2011 12:19:59 -0000
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:19:37 -0000
Message-ID: <20111027121937.30859.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: domainrep@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14CDA@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [domainrep] RFC 5782, was I-D.*-reputation-*.01
X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list <domainrep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep>
List-Post: <mailto:domainrep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep>, <mailto:domainrep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:20:02 -0000

>That would be the DNSBL RFC evaluation record.

RFC 5782 was originally an IRTF draft.  People noted that it was more
appropriate for standards track, so I changed it to that.
Unfortunately, the IESG has trouble dealing with anything related to
spam, and it quickly became clear that it would never get approved, at
least not in a usable form.  So I flipped it back to the IRTF stream
and ran it through that way.

So I wouldn't pay much attention to whatever the evaluation record
says.  I suspect we'll find that we want to return more than 32 bits
of results from a DNS query, so we'll use something other than an A
record, but it's severely premature optimization to worry about that
now.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email