[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [drinks] WG poll on transport protocol

From: Andrew Newton <andy at hxr.us>
To: "Alexander Mayrhofer" <alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at>
Cc: IETF DRINKS WG <drinks at ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:40:44 -0400
In-reply-to: <8BC845943058D844ABFC73D2220D46650859FC1F at nics-mail.sbg.nic.at>
References: <8BC845943058D844ABFC73D2220D46650859FC1F at nics-mail.sbg.nic.at>

On Jun 26, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:

The central counter argument is that SOAP is the most universally
deployed
data exchange mechanism out there and that anecdotal evidenceindicates
that
SOAP is the predominant form of transport mechanism in current useamong
SSP's and will be for the foreseeable future.

Not that I have a dog in this fight, but I seriously doubt that firstpart is true.


-andy

References:
- [drinks] WG poll on transport protocol
  - From: Alexander Mayrhofer

Prev by Date: [drinks] WG poll on transport protocol
Next by Date: Re: [drinks] WG poll on transport protocol
Previous by thread: [drinks] WG poll on transport protocol
Next by thread: Re: [drinks] WG poll on transport protocol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.