> I for one have concerns about how useful the resulting > protocol is likely to be, at least for my company's likely > applications. Penn, Thanks for that "wakeup call" - as we said we want definitely a deployable protocol, so i'm concerned about your statement - could you elaborate of what properties of the current draft would make it less useful for your company's applications, and what could be done to make it fit better? Thanks Alex
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.