Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion

["Elwell, John" <john.elwell at siemens-enterprise.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Otmar Lendl [mailto:lendl at nic.at] 
> Sent: 11 August 2009 20:01
> To: Elwell, John
> Cc: drinks at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion
> 
> Elwell, John wrote:
> > Otmar,
> > 
> > Why do you say both WGs are to blame? SPEERMINT does indeed have the
> > LUF/LRF split, so what do you feel is the problem in SPEERMINT?
> 
> John,
> 
> I haven't read the speermint docs (or the mailinglist) in a while, and
> missed the last session, too. But a quick glance at
> draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-13 shows fundamental
> LUF/LRF missunderstandings in that document. The SED should 
> be the output
> of the LRF and not the LUF.
[JRE] I see - that does indeed appear to be wrong.

John


> 
> *shrug*
> 
> > Also, perhaps you should post this to the SPEERMINT list too and say
> > that discussions are taking place on the DRINKS list (to 
> avoid ongoing
> > cross-posting).
> 
> I was mentioned by name in this thread, thus I replied here.
> 
> /ol
> -- 
> // Otmar Lendl <lendl at nic.at>, T: +43 1 5056416 - 33, F: - 933 //
>