Elwell, John wrote: > Otmar, > > Why do you say both WGs are to blame? SPEERMINT does indeed have the > LUF/LRF split, so what do you feel is the problem in SPEERMINT? John, I haven't read the speermint docs (or the mailinglist) in a while, and missed the last session, too. But a quick glance at draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-13 shows fundamental LUF/LRF missunderstandings in that document. The SED should be the output of the LRF and not the LUF. *shrug* > Also, perhaps you should post this to the SPEERMINT list too and say > that discussions are taking place on the DRINKS list (to avoid ongoing > cross-posting). I was mentioned by name in this thread, thus I replied here. /ol -- // Otmar Lendl <lendl at nic.at>, T: +43 1 5056416 - 33, F: - 933 //
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.