Re: [earlywarning] [CAP] Definition of Warning Categories
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [earlywarning] [CAP] Definition of Warning Categories



Hi Art, 

~snip~

#	What we're really talking about here seems to be how to apply SIP to
urgent one-to-many notifications.  Maybe if it were explicit that narrower,
more technical goal would be more tractable.

For me the scope of the work is quite narrow.

I re-wrote the requirements, terminology and framework document
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-norreys-ecrit-authority2individuals-requireme
nts-03.txt
based also on your feedback to re-scope the work. 

Then, there is the SIP CAP document 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-sipping-cap-04
(It needs to get re-written a bit to better incorporate the new terminology.
Maybe requesting specific warning categories is a bad idea and needs to be
deleted.)

There is also a document
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rosen-ecrit-lost-early-warning-01.txt that
may be needed to discover servers dynamically. But this is clearly more into
the future.

Looking at the XMPP work
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0127.html
we could get away with only a single document, namely the SIP CAP stuff.

I would scope the initial work in that way. 

Ciao
Hannes	

	- Art




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.