[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Ecrit] Suggestion for "performance and reliability" section
I don't think it meaningful to put a number on "until human answer"
unless you intend to automate humans, or are providing some technical
analysis on average call rates and staffing at 911 PSAPs. The latter
would be a good NENA exercise, but not sure if that is in scope of
ECRIT.
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of Henning Schulzrinne
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 11:57 AM
> To: Byron Smith
> Cc: ecrit at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Suggestion for "performance and
> reliability" section
>
> I don't think I mentioned NENA. My source of the information
> was the LAPD PSAP (which I visited during the NENA meeting).
> The person in charge said that their goal was 10s in 95% (not
> sure about the
> percentage) from call to human answer. They apparently
> tracked this information. In their case, the concern was
> primarily human response time, not routing time. Call setup
> time in mobile systems often approaches several seconds.
>
> Beyond these anecdotal numbers, I'm not sure that we'll be
> able to rely on existing performance standards and that we
> can draw much insight from any number we get, except that
> having a gnome looking up the information in an atlas is
> likely to be unsatisfactory and that faster is better.
>
> I also suspect that the only protocol that would likely fail
> a reasonable lookup time test, except by pure implementor
> stupidity, would be one that walked a geo search tree with
> widely distributed servers for each query.
>
>
> Byron Smith wrote:
> > Henning, where do you get the NENA 2s and 10s numbers? The
> only thing
> > I have found in NENA documents is:
> >
> > " 9 Call Set-up Time
> > It is recommended that emergency call set-up time not
> exceed the
> > average call set-up time for any
> > other type call made by the customers of that
> particular serving
> > office.
> >
> > It is also strongly recommended that in all circumstances the
> > caller hear either audible ring tone or a
> > recording alerting them that their call is being processed."
> >
> > The above is from NENA 03-501. I have looked for other NENA
> > recommendations, but have not found them.
> >
> > I would appreciate a reference if you have one.
> >
> > Not that this is terribly relevant: But I would make a small wager
> > that more than 50% of the (rural) wireline 911 systems in
> the country
> > fail to meet the above recommendations. (Probably closer
> to 80%) The
> > observed call setup time for systems that use CAMA trunks
> is usually
> > 3-7 seconds dial-to-ring, with 5 seconds being typical.
> Most digital
> > end-office switches make local dial-to-ring setups on the
> order of 1 second.
> >
> > Byron
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org
> [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org]On Behalf
> >>Of Henning Schulzrinne
> >>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 4:08 AM
> >>To: ecrit at ietf.org
> >>Subject: [Ecrit] Suggestion for "performance and
> reliability" section
> >>
> >>
> >>I would think capturing the known external requirements as such is
> >>helpful. For example, the NENA 2s (dial-to-ring)
> requirement, which is
> >>part of the 10s dial-to-pick-up I mentioned could just be
> captured as
> >>such external guidelines, possibly in a separate "performance and
> >>reliability" section. If early implementations, with reasonable
> >>assumptions on round-trip times and topology, can't satisfy
> those, we
> >>know we have a problem.
> >>
> >>Henning
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Ecrit mailing list
> >>Ecrit at ietf.org
> >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> >>--
> >>No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >>Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date:
> >>7/28/2005
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ecrit mailing list
> > Ecrit at ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit