Re: [Ecrit] Security requirements absorbed from pre-interim requirements document

["Tom-PT Taylor" <taylor at nortel.com>]

I suppose it would be a more efficient use of people's time if we focus 
on the re-issued I-D.  I'll try to have that out in a day or so.

Andrew Newton wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2005, at 12:05 PM, Tom-PT Taylor wrote:
>
> > This note is just a record of decisions taken at the May interim  
> > meeting that affect the security requirements document.  It's basic  
> > spadework preceding an update of that document.
>
>
> Are you looking for comments on these items now, or do you want us to  
> wait until the draft is written?
>
> -andy


_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit