[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ecrit] comments on I-D Mapping Arch



 Hi henning,

I went through the draft and it is in a good shape. Here are my comments:

* The draft extensively uses civic location look up as an example, however it will be helpful for the reader to know how Geo look up will work based on the architecture. I knew the discussion that the mechanism is the same for both civic and geo look up but, as/for a reader, some information about geo is missing.


* For some reasons, if the seeker gets the wrong PSAP information (or not reachable), what the seeker shall do? Does this issue is relevant for the architecture? For example, recommendtions to contact default PSAP?,


* IMHO, the structure of the document may be reformatted, for example section 4 gives the overview of the operation and then section 5,6,8 also provides some repetitve information. It would be good to combine those sections acordingly. Then it can explain the basic operation of the mapping architcure.

For example:
Section 4: Overview of the components/entities (Trees, FGs, Resolvers, Seeker)
Section 5: Basic Operation (Architecture, operation, answering queries, scalability...)
 
ciao,
Raj.
 
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit